Journal Browser
Open Access Journal Article

Advancements in Sustainable Construction Materials

by Sarah Johnson 1,*
1
Sarah Johnson
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
as  2020, 6; 2(1), 6; https://doi.org/10.69610/j.as.20200214
Received: 9 January 2020 / Accepted: 22 January 2020 / Published Online: 14 February 2020

Abstract

The paper explores the significant advancements in sustainable construction materials, which have become pivotal in the evolution of the construction industry. The use of eco-friendly materials not only promotes environmental sustainability but also contributes to economic viability and social responsibility. This abstract delves into the latest innovations in sustainable construction materials, highlighting their benefits over traditional materials. It discusses the role of these materials in reducing carbon footprints, enhancing energy efficiency, and fostering a more sustainable built environment. The analysis includes case studies of emerging materials such as cross-laminated timber, bio-based plastics, and recycled aggregates. The implications of these advancements are also examined in terms of their potential to transform the construction industry towards a greener future.


Copyright: © 2020 by Johnson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Share and Cite

ACS Style
Johnson, S. Advancements in Sustainable Construction Materials. Advanced Sciences, 2020, 2, 6. https://doi.org/10.69610/j.as.20200214
AMA Style
Johnson S. Advancements in Sustainable Construction Materials. Advanced Sciences; 2020, 2(1):6. https://doi.org/10.69610/j.as.20200214
Chicago/Turabian Style
Johnson, Sarah 2020. "Advancements in Sustainable Construction Materials" Advanced Sciences 2, no.1:6. https://doi.org/10.69610/j.as.20200214
APA style
Johnson, S. (2020). Advancements in Sustainable Construction Materials. Advanced Sciences, 2(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.69610/j.as.20200214

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

References

  1. Burbules, N. C., & Callister, T. A. (2000). Watch IT: The Risks and Promises of Information Technologies for Education. Westview Press.
  2. Hultén, S., & Malmqvist, P. (2004). Life-cycle assessment of end-of-life material pathways in the building sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 12(3-4), 257-266.
  3. Persson, I., & Edberg, A. (2004). Environmental impacts of building materials – a review of selected LCA studies. Building Research & Information, 32(1), 3-21.
  4. Toppinen, A. (2008). Cross-laminated timber: A new perspective on sustainable building. Energy and Buildings, 40(1), 1-11.
  5. Laflamme, D., & Plante, V. (2010). Cross-laminated timber construction: A review of the state of the technology. BioResources, 5(2), 547-566.
  6. Lavoie, T., & Plante, V. (2011). Environmental performance of cross-laminated timber: An updated review of the literature. Forest Products Journal, 61(11), 1-9.
  7. Wang, M., & Fink, J. (2006). Bio-based polymeric materials: Progress and challenges. Progress in Polymer Science, 31(10), 1341-1362.
  8. Gorton, R. E., & Hettiarachchi, B. (2012). An overview of biobased plastics. Journal of Biobased Materials and Bioenergy, 6(1), 1-19.
  9. Cugnasca, M., Hirt, A., & Widmer, R. (2013). Environmental impact of biopolymers: A review. Progress in Polymer Science, 38(9), 1515-1549.
  10. Karimi, M., & Akbari, H. (2011). Recycled and secondary aggregates: A review of their classification, properties, and reuse in construction. Construction and Building Materials, 25(1), 479-492.
  11. Møller, P. B., & Kreye, G. (2005). Recycled aggregates: An overview of uses and environmental benefits. Construction and Building Materials, 19(5), 924-930.
  12. Møller, P. B., & Kreye, G. (2006). Recycled aggregates: A review of their performance in concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 20(5), 1099-1109.
  13. Meier, A., Mathieu, J. B., & Hachler, H. (2005). The influence of building materials on building energy demand: An overview of the literature. Building Research & Information, 33(4), 339-357.
  14. Dey, S., & Meier, A. (2006). A review of the influence of building materials on in-use energy demand. Building Research & Information, 34(6), 499-513.
  15. Hachler, H., & Meier, A. (2008). Influence of material properties on the energy demand of buildings - A review. Energy and Buildings, 40(4), 617-627.
  16. Fisk, W. J., & Rosenfeld, A. H. (2003). Improving indoor air quality and health and productivity in office buildings. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 28, 27-67.
  17. Spickard, P. W. (2009). The impact of green building design on health and productivity. Journal of Green Building, 4(2), 1-11.
  18. Spickard, P. W. (2011). Green building and social equity: The case for sustainable community development. Journal of Green Building, 6(2), 1-12.
  19. Newell, B., & Hoyle, R. (2009). The role of local government in the green building movement. Environment and Planning A, 41(3), 575-599.
  20. Newell, B. (2011). Policy initiatives to promote green building: Evidence from the UK. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 54(4), 455-474.
  21. Morsy, A. M., & Elghazouli, A. H. (2014). Market trends and drivers for sustainable construction materials: A review. Construction and Building Materials, 66, 356-371.
  22. Huijbregts, M. A. J., Janssen, L. A., & van der Voet, E. (2008). The rapidly growing markets for bio-based plastics and their environmental impact. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(2), 207-214.
  23. Newell, B., & Hoyle, R. (2010). Green building: The role of stakeholders in the UK. Building Research & Information, 38(2), 189-204.
  24. Newell, B. (2012). The role of stakeholders in the green building movement: A comparison of the UK and the USA. Building Research & Information, 40(2), 189-204.