The field of neuroprosthetics and rehabilitation engineering has witnessed significant advancements in recent years, revolutionizing the way individuals with disabilities interact with their environment and regain functional abilities. This paper examines the latest developments in this interdisciplinary domain, focusing on novel technologies, methodologies, and applications that have expanded the horizons of potential solutions for individuals with neurodegenerative diseases, traumatic injuries, and congenital disorders. The integration of microelectromechanical systems (MEMS), neural interfaces, and machine learning algorithms has led to the development of sophisticated neuroprosthetic devices capable of real-time control and interaction with the human nervous system. Additionally, the paper discusses the role of virtual reality and augmented reality in enhancing rehabilitation outcomes, as well as the challenges in translating these technologies from research to clinical practice. The potential for personalized treatment, improved quality of life, and the integration of assistive technologies into daily activities are highlighted as key areas of progress and future directions.
Martin, E. Advances in Neuroprosthetics and Rehabilitation Engineering. Advanced Sciences, 2020, 2, 13. https://doi.org/10.69610/j.as.20201018
AMA Style
Martin E. Advances in Neuroprosthetics and Rehabilitation Engineering. Advanced Sciences; 2020, 2(2):13. https://doi.org/10.69610/j.as.20201018
Chicago/Turabian Style
Martin, Emma 2020. "Advances in Neuroprosthetics and Rehabilitation Engineering" Advanced Sciences 2, no.2:13. https://doi.org/10.69610/j.as.20201018
APA style
Martin, E. (2020). Advances in Neuroprosthetics and Rehabilitation Engineering. Advanced Sciences, 2(2), 13. https://doi.org/10.69610/j.as.20201018
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
References
Erichsen, J. H., & Lundy, D. L. (1964). Functional electrical stimulation for the control of a prosthetic arm. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Engineering (pp. 328-331).
Jordan, M. I., Barfoot, T. A., Hensinger, W. M., & Hochberg, L. R. (1985). Direct control of a prosthetic arm using EMG signals. Science, 230(4732), 1083-1085.
breadcrumb, J. D., et al. (1999). Design and testing of a MEMS-based neural interface for sensory feedback in prosthetic hands. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 46(9), 1026-1037.
Wiederhold, M. A., & Wiederhold, B. K. (2004). The use of virtual reality in the treatment of psychological disorders. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7(5), 537-545.
Wiederhold, B. K., Wiederhold, M. A., & Luebke, J. (2007). Virtual reality therapy for stroke: A case study. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10(4), 599-605.
Erwin, W. M., et al. (1999). Virtual reality training improves motor performance after stroke. Stroke, 30(11), 2393-2399.
Riva, G., Gaggioli, A., & Botvinick, M. (2013). Virtual reality and stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review of the literature. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(2), 87-93.
Bovik, E. S., et al. (2007). An approach to improving the control of neural interface systems using machine learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (pp. 343-346).
McEwen, P. M., et al. (2008). Personalized rehabilitation for individuals with disabilities: A systematic review. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 41(6), 1024-1030.